The Role of Decision Making in the Pre

The Role of Decision Making in the Pre-Crisis Peri Essay od of India (15 March, 1959 7 September, 1962) The Role of Decision Making in the Pre-Crisis Peri Essayod of India (15 March, 1959 7 September, 1962) Boyko Iaramov Introduction to International Relations Professor Bond The year 1962 was the unfortunate year for India which knocked out any possibility of understanding between China and India. Of course, such an act of terror could have not started without some kind of the reason, whatever it may be. The chronological order of pre-crisis decisions taken Indias authorities are of great importance. The role of the decision-makers before the time of the armed conflict had a big significance for Indias position on political and economic matters in the continent of Asia. A major figure in Indias decision making was Jawaharlal Nehru, leader of the Congress Party, head of the Planning Commission and chief spokesman of the government in Parliament. These titles not only made him an important nationalistic figure but also Gandhis appointed heir and a major architect of Indias political institutions (Brecher, 1959). Krishna Menon, the controversial defense minister consulted in almost every issue along with Pandit Govind Ballabh Pant was also a figure of great importance (Langyel, 1962). This importance was mainly derived from the fact that both shared the same overall world view of Nehru. However, in order to understand the cruicial importance of decision-makers, we shall looked seperately at each of Indias top men. Menon was highly important and useful to Nehru in the essence that the latter helped Nehru convey his thought and policies to the outside world in a forceful and organized manner (Brecher, 1959). But as Rajani Palme Dutt said in his book The problem of India, foreign policy was exercised more behind the scenes than in meetings of the committee. Both Menon and Nehru acted to the desire of Nehru. It was often when the Foreign secretary would take to Pant drafts of diplomatic correspondence and get the reaction which was usually at Nehrus request (Hoffmann,1990). Foreign policy makers Nehru, Menon and Pant shared a common world view which clearly showed their psychological predisposition, drawn from the sources of their personality, idiosyncrasy, ideology, tradition, culture and history. As we shall see further down, in the mainstream of common ideas and beliefs, they indeed had some differences. But all these men used the attitudinal prism (Hoffmann, 1990), the lens through which they filtered and structured the information thus perceiving the world. One set of Indian beliefs referred to the role India should play world. This role was supposed to reflect the fact that India was a considerably new nation-state. India also had to preserve her independence of action. It didnt simply fight for independence simply to become a camp follower of any of the Cold War Power blocs. The restrictions and limitations that such a position imply would be against Indias national interest. And it was exactly this nonalignment policy of Nehru between the two sides of the Cold War which was the projection of Indian nationalism into world affairs (Maxwell, 1970). Nehru also expressed the idea that India was an Asian power that should not be overlooked at. He demonstrated that in regard to any major problem of a country or a group of countries of Asia, India has to be considered (Gopal, 1980). .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .postImageUrl , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:hover , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:visited , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:active { border:0!important; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:active , .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0614a49e94cb7f33c160fcd5bfe37bfb:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Juvenile delinquents Persuasive Essay During the 1950s and 1960s Nehru and his advisors realized that India was playing a far more than neutral role in the Cold War politics. She was a very important player on the world stage, where questions of war and peace were decided. He recognized that in s bipolar world, in which relations between the superpowers were based mainly on balance-of-power calculations (Hoffmann, 1990), a nuclear holocaust, for example, had become highly likely. He sought that India should stay out of the superpowers way in the nuclear arms race and at the same time work to the reduction of superpower confrontation by fostering communication, engaging in .